HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2503.17354: HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks
Community feed
A focused stream of recent stories from the sources curated for this community. Latest: HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks, Response to OSTP on AI Action Plan, and Why it’s good for AI reasoning to be legible and faithful. Page 27.
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2503.17354: HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks
Suggested priorities for the Office of Science and Technology Policy as it develops an AI Action Plan.
Why legible and faithful reasoning is valuable for safely developing powerful AI
We evaluated DeepSeek-R1 for dangerous autonomous capabilities and found no evidence of dangerous capabilities beyond those of existing models such as Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o. Interestingly, we found that it did not do substantially better than...
Additional details about our evaluations of GPT-4.5, and some discussion about the limitations of pre-deployment evaluations and current evaluation methodologies.
This report outlines the safety work carried out prior to releasing deep research including external red teaming, frontier risk evaluations according to our Preparedness Framework, and an overview of the mitigations we built in to address key risk areas.
Can frontier LLMs earn $1 million from real-world freelance software engineering?
What the EU AI Act requires in 2025–2027, how it lines up with the UK ICO's AI & Data Protection Risk Toolkit, and the exact outputs your team should ship.
We measured the performance of frontier models at writing GPU kernels. With a small amount of scaffolding, we found that the best model can provide an average speedup on KernelBench of 1.8x.
We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.
LLM-as-a-judge on Amazon Bedrock Model Evaluation | Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services (AWS)
We evaluated DeepSeek-V3 for dangerous autonomous capabilities and found no evidence of dangerous capabilities beyond those of existing models such as Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o. We also confirmed that its performance on GPQA is not due to training data...
More stories load automatically as you scroll.